Key result
The combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP demonstrated high diagnostic value for chronic heart failure with an AUC of 0.968 (95% CI 0.953-0.984).
Why the study?
Does the combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP improve diagnostic accuracy for chronic heart failure compared to either biomarker alone?
Case-Control (n=303)
Does the combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP improve diagnostic accuracy for chronic heart failure compared to either biomarker alone?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.968 for sST2+NT-proBNP (95% CI 0.953-0.984)
The combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP provides high diagnostic accuracy for chronic heart failure, outperforming either biomarker alone.
Serum sST2 and NT-proBNP may aid CHF assessment; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
OBJECTIVE: Our study was to explore the roles between serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) while evaluating ventricular function to properly diagnose chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In total, 197 CHF patients were recruited and classified into ventricular function's II, III, and IV groups, and 106 healthy people into normal control group. To detect concentrations of Sst2 and NT-proBNP, ELISA and electro-chemiluminescence immuno assay were implemented. An automatic biochemical analyzer was used to determine the levels of the following: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and uric acid (UA). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was adopted to detect the diagnostic value sST2 and NT-ProBNP in CHF and the logistic regression analysis involving the risk factors of CHF. RESULTS: Serum sST2 and NT-proBNP concentrations were increased significantly in the ventricular function's II, III, and IV groups in a manner dependent on concentration as opposed to the manner the normal control group occupied. The area under the curve (AUC) of sST2, found NT-proBNP and sST2+NT-proBNP to be 0.942 (95% CI: 0.917-0.966), 0.920 (95% CI: 0.891-0.948), and 0.968 (95% CI: 0.953-0.984), respectively. sST2, NT-proBNP, UA, and Cr were verified as important risk factors of CHF. CONCLUSION: Serum sST2 and NT-ProBNP could act as diagnostic indicators for CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Chronic heart failure (CHF) (n=303). Serum sST2 and NT-proBNP vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Diagnostic value for CHF (Area Under the Curve) (AUC 0.968 for sST2+NT-proBNP, 95% CI 0.953-0.984). The combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP demonstrated high diagnostic value for chronic heart failure with an AUC of 0.968 (95% CI 0.953-0.984).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: