Key result
Combining sST2 with NT-proBNP improves heart failure detection over either biomarker alone in observational analysis.
Why the study?
NT-proBNP levels are often elevated in CKD patients, complicating heart failure diagnosis, and novel biomarkers like sST2 need evaluation for diagnostic value.
Does the combination of sST2 and NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for heart failure compared to either biomarker alone in patients with and without chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=420)
Does the combination of sST2 and NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for heart failure compared to either biomarker alone in patients with and without chronic kidney disease?
p-value: p=<0.05
sST2 is less affected by renal function than NT-proBNP, and combining both biomarkers improves the diagnostic accuracy for heart failure in patients with and without chronic kidney disease.
May aid HF diagnosis in CKD; extends biomarker data but remains hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are often markedly elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Identifying novel biomarkers is an important step toward effective diagnosis. Interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1) protein and human/Soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) are promising biomarkers for heart failure (HF). This study aimed to assess the trend of NT-proBNP and sST2 in chronic kidney disease and their diagnostic value for HF. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was carried out on 420 patients who were divided into a no heart failure group (N=182) and a heart failure group (N=238). Spearman correlation analysis was used to test the association of sST2 and NT-proBNP with renal function. The diagnostic value of each biomarker was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to 3 different forms: Total group (n=420), non-CKD group (n=217), and CKD group (n=203). RESULTS A striking correlation between eGFR and NT-proBNP (r=-0.525; P<0.001) seemed to be far stronger than that with sST2 (r=-0.147; P<0.05). The optimum cutoff points for sST2 and NT-proBNP to detect HF were 28.960 ng/mL and 1280 pg/mL, respectively, in total, 28.71 ng/mL and 481 pg/mL, respectively, in non-CKD patients, and 30.55 ng/mL and 3314 pg/mL, respectively, in CKD patients. The combined model of sST2 and NT-proBNP was superior to the model of sST2 or NT-proBNP alone, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic value of sST2 is less affected by decreased renal function. sST2 combined with NT-proBNP may improve the diagnostic accuracy of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure and chronic kidney disease (n=420). sST2 and NT-proBNP biomarkers vs. Single biomarker models was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for heart failure (p=<0.05). A combined diagnostic model of sST2 and NT-proBNP was superior to either biomarker alone for detecting heart failure (P<0.05), with sST2 being less affected by decreased renal function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: