Key result
Bindarit (600 mg or 1,200 mg) did not significantly reduce in-segment late loss at six months compared to placebo following percutaneous coronary intervention (ITT 0.54 and 0.52 vs 0.72; p=0.21).
Why the study?
Does bindarit reduce in-segment late loss in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=148)
Double-blind
Randomised into three arms
Yes
Does bindarit reduce in-segment late loss in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention?
In patients undergoing PCI, bindarit did not significantly reduce the primary endpoint of in-segment late loss at 6 months, though it was well tolerated and reduced in-stent late loss.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support bindarit after PCI; confirms lack of efficacy and closes this line of investigation.
AIMS: Bindarit (BND) is a selective inhibitor of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2), which plays an important role in generating intimal hyperplasia. Our aim was to explore the efficacy and safety of bindarit in preventing restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: A phase II, double-blind, multicentre randomised trial included 148 patients randomised into three arms (BND 600 mg, n=48; BND 1,200 mg, n=49; PLB, n=51). Bindarit was given following PCI and continued for 180 days. Monthly clinical follow-up and six-month coronary angiography were conducted. The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss; the main secondary endpoints were in-stent late loss and major adverse cardiovascular events. Efficacy analysis was carried out on two populations, ITT and PP. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics among the three treatment groups. In-segment and in-stent late loss at six months in BND 600, BND 1,200 and PLB were: (ITT 0.54 vs. 0.52 vs. 0.72; p=0.21), (PP 0.46 vs. 0.53 vs. 0.72; p=0.12) and (ITT 0.74 vs. 0.74 vs. 1.05; p=0.01), (PP 0.66 vs. 0.73 vs. 1.06; p=0.003), respectively. The MACE rates at nine months among treatment groups were 20.8% vs. 28.6% vs. 25.5% (p=0.54), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This was a negative study with the primary endpoint not being met. However, significant reduction in the in-stent late loss suggests that bindarit probably exerts a favourable action on the vessel wall following angioplasty. Bindarit was well tolerated with a compliance rate of over 90%. A larger study utilising a loading dose and targeting a specific patient cohort may demonstrate more significant results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colombo et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Coronary stent restenosis (n=148). Bindarit vs. Placebo was evaluated on In-segment late loss at six months (p=0.21). Bindarit (600 mg or 1,200 mg) did not significantly reduce in-segment late loss at six months compared to placebo following percutaneous coronary intervention (ITT 0.54 and 0.52 vs 0.72; p=0.21).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: