Does drug-coated balloon reduce major adverse cardiac events and late lumen loss compared to drug-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis?
Drug-coated balloons are comparable to drug-eluting stents regarding overall clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis, though they are associated with a higher rate of target lesion revascularization.
BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have promising results in the management of in-stent restenosis (ISR), still their role remains a major challenge, and not well established in contemporary clinical practice. AIMS: To provide a comprehensive appraisal of the efficacy and safety of DCBs in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane Central from inception until 30 March, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DCB versus DES in ISR patients. Our primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and late lumen loss (LLL). Secondary clinical endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, TLR, TVR, and stent thrombosis, and angiographic outcomes were MLD, and in-stent binary restenosis. RESULTS: Ten RCTs comprising 1977 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of MACE was 15.57% in the DCB group compared to 14.13% in the DES group, with no significant difference in the risk of MACE following DCB (odds ratio OR 1.04, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.87 to 1.44). Compared with the DES intervention, the risk of LLL was comparable to the DCB intervention (mean difference MD -0.08, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.02), while the incidence of TLR was increased in the DCB intervention (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.99). CONCLUSION: DCB was comparable to DES implantation is ISR patients regarding clinical outcomes, however it showed an increase in TLR events. Moreover, a RCT with large sample size and longer follow-up duration is warrened to validate these results.
Abdelaziz et al. (Wed,) studied this question.