Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: On a voluntary basis therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was implemented in the ALL-BFM 2000 protocol for the three currently used asparaginase (ASNase) preparations (first line: native Escherichia coli ASNase; second line: pegylated ASNase and third line: Erwinia chrysanthemi ASNase). PROCEDURE: Between 2000 and 2007, 2,074 ASNase samples from 763 patients out of 114 hospitals were evaluated (5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase (n = 318), 1,000 U/m2 pegylated ASNase (n = 416) and 10,000 U/m2 Erwinia chrysanthemi ASNase (n = 29)). RESULTS: First-line therapy with 5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase resulted in an ASNase activity of <100 U/L in 10% of all samples from day +3 after administration. Second-line treatment with 1,000 U/m2 PEG ASNase led to activity values below 100 U/L in approximately 30% of all samples taken +7 days. Relating ASNase activity to route of administration, 10,000 U/m2 Erwinia ASNase IM compared to IV as third-line treatment, led to a higher median activity (IM: median 151.5 U/L, range (0-750 U/L); IV: median 115 U/L, range (0-884 U/L), P = 0.3) and fewer samples below 100 U/L (IM: 15% vs. IV: 45%) at day +2. CONCLUSION: The reduced dose of 5,000 U/m2 E. coli ASNase for induction treatment succeeded to achieve an activity level above 100 U/L in more than 90% of all samples. They confirm that dose reduction is reasonable and provide the basis for future treatment strategies employing ASNase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schrey et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: