Key result
Sevoflurane was non-inferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and all-cause 30-day mortality (25% vs 30%; absolute difference -5.4%, upper 95% CI 1.4%).
Why the study?
Does sevoflurane compared to isoflurane reduce the composite of prolonged ICU stay and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=464)
Double-blind (patients, outcome assessors, and caregivers except anesthesiologist/perfusionist)
1:1 ratio using randomly permuted blocks
No
Does sevoflurane compared to isoflurane reduce the composite of prolonged ICU stay and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery?
Relative Risk: 0.82 (95% CI 0.61–1.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 30%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 5.4%
p-value: p=0.21
Sevoflurane is non-inferior, but not superior, to isoflurane regarding prolonged ICU stay and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.
Sevoflurane noninferior to isoflurane for major cardiac surgery outcomes; extends volatile agent options without added risk.
PURPOSE: Volatile anesthetics possess cardioprotective properties, but it is unknown if the cardioprotective effects extend equally to all members of the class. Although sevoflurane is a relatively newer anesthetic than isoflurane, its introduction into practice was not preceded by a head-to-head comparison with isoflurane in a trial focusing on clinically important outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether sevoflurane was non-inferior to isoflurane on a clinically important primary outcome in a heterogeneous group of adults undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness clinical trial in 464 adults having coronary artery bypass graft and/or single valve surgery during November 2011 to March 2014. The intervention was maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane (n = 231) or isoflurane (n = 233) administered at a dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC throughout the entire operation. All caregivers were blinded except for the anesthesiologist and perfusionist. The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥ 48 hr and all-cause 30-day mortality. We hypothesized that sevoflurane would be non-inferior to isoflurane (non-inferiority margin < 10% based on an expected event rate of 25%). Secondary outcomes included prolonged ICU stay, 30- and 365-day all-cause mortality, inotrope or vasopressor usage, new-onset hemodialysis or atrial fibrillation, stroke, and readmission to the ICU. RESULTS: No losses to follow-up occurred. The primary outcome occurred in 25% of sevoflurane patients and 30% of isoflurane patients (absolute difference, -5.4%; one-sided 95% confidence interval, 1.4), thus non-inferiority was declared. Sevoflurane was not superior to isoflurane for the primary outcome (P = 0.21) or for any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane is non-inferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and all-cause 30-day mortality. Sevoflurane is not superior to isoflurane on any other of the clinically important outcomes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01477151.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Cardiac surgery (CABG and/or single valve surgery) (n=464). Sevoflurane vs. Isoflurane was evaluated on Composite of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥ 48 hr and all-cause 30-day mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11, p=0.21). Sevoflurane was non-inferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and all-cause 30-day mortality (25% vs 30%; absolute difference -5.4%, upper 95% CI 1.4%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: