Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We validated the determination of extracellular water (ECW) by the bioelectrical impedance method (BIA), using the RJL manufacturer-supplied equation and the equation of Lukaski in 34 growth hormone-deficient (GHD) patients before and after replacement with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH), using the bromide-dilution (Br-) method as the reference method. At baseline, paired comparisons showed no significant differences between mean ECW assessed by the Br- method and by BIA using both equations in the placebo and rhGH group. At 6 months, no significant difference was found between ECW assessed by the Br- method and by BIA using the manufacturer-supplied equation, both in the placebo and rhGH group. High coefficients of reliability (0.88-0.98) and high correlations (0.79-0.98; p < 0.001) were found between ECW assessed by the Br- method and by BIA applying two different regression equations in the placebo and rhGH groups at baseline and after 6 months. Mean differences in ECW assessed by the Br- method and BIA were between 2.6 and 4.1% of the mean ECW determined by the Br- method at baseline and between 2.7 and 8.5% after 6 months. Multiple comparisons showed a significantly greater ECW assessed by the Br- method than by BIA using the equation of Lukaski (p < 0.0001). This difference was found in the placebo and rhGH replacement group. The difference changed with time (p = 0.005), indicating that the usefulness of the formula of Lukaski seems to be affected by rhGH replacement therapy. We conclude that the noninvasive BIA technique might be a useful method to predict ECW in GHD patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snel et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: