Key result
Low-level exercise echo detects contractile reserve in 55% of akinetic segments and predicts functional recovery.
Why the study?
The authors hypothesized that endogenous catecholamines produced during low-level exercise echocardiography could serve as a myocardial stressor to elicit contractile reserve and predict functional improvement early after acute myocardial infarction.
Does low-level exercise echocardiography predict reversible myocardial dysfunction in patients early after acute myocardial infarction compared to low-dose dobutamine echocardiography?
RCT (n=52)
random order
Does low-level exercise echocardiography predict reversible myocardial dysfunction in patients early after acute myocardial infarction compared to low-dose dobutamine echocardiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 63%
Low-level exercise echocardiography is a promising and feasible alternative to low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for identifying myocardial viability early after acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate low-level exercise echocardiography (LLEE) in detecting contractile reserve and predicting functional improvement of akinetic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical studies have shown that low-dose dobutamine enhances contractile function of dyssynergic but viable myocardium in patients with recent AMI. We hypothesized that endogenous catecholamines produced during a LLEE test could serve as a myocardial stressor to elicit contractile reserve. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with first AMI and > or =2 akinetic segments in the infarct-related territory underwent 5 +/- 2 days after AMI low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE) (5, 10 and 15 microg/kg/min) and LLEE (25 W during 3 min on a supine bicycle, with continuous echocardiographic recording). Both tests were performed on the same day, in random order. Follow-up echocardiography was obtained one month later. Regional wall thickening was semi-quantitatively assessed using a 16-segment, 5-grade scale model. Contractile reserve was defined as improvement in wall thickening of > or =1 grade. RESULTS: Mean increase in heart rate during stress tests was 15 +/- 7 beats/min with LLEE and 13 +/- 6 beats/min with LDDE (p = NS). Contractile reserve was detected in 119 (55%) of 217 akinetic segments at LLEE and in 137 (63%) segments at LDDE. At follow-up study, functional improvement was identified in 139 (64%) segments. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for predicting functional recovery were 81%, 92%, 95% and 73%, respectively, for LLEE, and 91%, 86%, 92% and 84%, respectively, for LDDE. Moreover, there was a good correlation between systolic wall thickening measured in the center of the dyssynergic area during stress tests and at follow-up study: r = 0.77, p < 0.001 with exercise testing and r = 0.73, p < 0.001 with dobutamine testing. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level exercise echocardiography provides a promising alternative to LDDE for identifying myocardial viability and predicting reversible dysfunction early after AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffer et al. (1999) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (n=52). Low-level exercise echocardiography vs. Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of contractile reserve in akinetic segments. Low-level exercise echocardiography detected contractile reserve in 55% of akinetic segments (vs 63% with dobutamine) and predicted functional recovery with 81% sensitivity and 92% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: