Why the study?
Symptomatic cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis portends poor prognosis, but the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in systemic sclerosis patients with heart failure had not been investigated.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, and natriuretic peptide levels in patients with systemic sclerosis and heart failure?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, and natriuretic peptide levels in patients with systemic sclerosis and heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a small retrospective cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis and HFrEF, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with significant improvements in LVEF, NT-proBNP levels, and NYHA functional class without worsening renal function, though symptomatic hypotension led to discontinuation in 16.7% of patients.
Introduction: Cardiac involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) can present variably from being asymptomatic to manifesting with heart failure, conduction abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, and pericardial effusion. Symptomatic cardiac involvement portends a poor prognosis and worse overall survival. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has been shown to significantly reduce hospitalization rates and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate the effects of SV treatment in patients with SSc and heart failure. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with SSc was conducted using an electronic data capture tool. Patients with SSc treated with SV between January 2015 and August 2023 were identified. Comprehensive clinical phenotyping and longitudinal data analysis were performed to characterize the sub-type of patients and evaluate clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and mortality, laboratory markers, and echocardiographic findings. Results: Twenty-four patients with SSc were treated with SV for a mean duration of 20.6 months. HFrEF was the primary indication for SV use in 91% of patients, primarily due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (87.5%). There was a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure from 128 mmHg to 114 mmHg (p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP levels from 15,130 pg/mL to 5082 pg/mL (p = 0.046). In the 19 patients with baseline and follow-up echocardiograms, there was a significant improvement in LVEF from 40.3% to 47.7% (p = 0.014). Hypotension was a common side effect leading to discontinuation of SV (n = 4, 16.7%). Serum creatinine had trends of improvement (1.9 mg/dL to 1.3 mg/d), though it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.057). Conclusions: This study showed that SV effectively improved cardiac symptoms and function in patients with SSc presenting with HFrEF. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the role of SV in the treatment of other manifestations of SSc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eshak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: