Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril valsartan on heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in patients on hemodialysis with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Does sacubitril valsartan reduce the composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with heart failure and ejection fraction >40%?
Does sacubitril valsartan reduce the composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with heart failure and ejection fraction >40%?
In hemodialysis patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF, sacubitril valsartan improved echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and LV hypertrophy but did not significantly reduce the composite of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death over 12 months.
SV use warrants caution in hemodialysis HFpEF; leaves open whether cardiac improvements translate to fewer events.
Background This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril valsartan (SV) on heart failure (HF) hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in patients on hemodialysis with HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF; HFpEF). Methods This single-center, prospective study enrolled 155 stable hemodialysis patients with EF > 40% who were followed up for 12 months. Fifty-nine patients were treated with SV; the others were matched for EF (57.89 ± 9.35 vs. 58.00 ± 11.82, P = 0.9) at a ratio of 1:1 and included as controls. The target dosage of SV was 200 mg/day. Results Twenty-three (23/155; 14.84%) had HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), while 132 (85.16%) had HFpEF. After SV treatment, the peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/peak early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity(E/e’) improved from 17.19 ± 8.74 to 12.80 ± 5.52 ( P = 0.006), the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter decreased from 53.14 ± 7.67 mm to 51.56 ± 7.44 mm ( P = 0.03), and the LV mass index decreased from 165.7 ± 44.6 g/m 2 to 154.8 ± 24.0 g/m 2 ( P = 0.02). LVEF ( P = 0.08) and LV global longitudinal strain ( P = 0.7) did not change significantly. The composite outcome of first and recurrent HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death showed no difference between group. However, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup (ADQI) HF class improved in 39 and 15 patients and worsened in 1 and 11 patients in the SV and control groups, respectively ( P < 0.001). Age, diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary arterial pressure were independent risk factors for HF hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFpEF. Conclusions SV improved LV hypertrophy, diastolic function, and the ADQI class for HF; however, it failed to reduce the composite endpoints of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular disease-related mortality over 12 months of follow-up in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with EF of > 40%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: