Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan is linked to an ~18% absolute LVEF improvement in hemodialysis patients with HFrEF.
Why the study?
Sacubitril/valsartan use in maintenance hemodialysis patients with HFrEF remains limited due to safety concerns and a lack of robust evidence.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac reverse remodeling and is it safe in patients with HFrEF undergoing maintenance hemodialysis?
Case Report (n=4)
No
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac reverse remodeling and is it safe in patients with HFrEF undergoing maintenance hemodialysis?
Effect estimate: 51.4% relative increase
Absolute Event Rate: 53.7% vs 35.5%
Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improved cardiac function, reverse remodeling, and an acceptable safety profile in a small cohort of patients with HFrEF undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
May support use in select HFrEF hemodialysis cases; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background and Clinical Significance: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is highly prevalent among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is a cornerstone therapy for HFrEF; however, its use in dialysis patients remains limited due to safety concerns and lack of robust evidence. This case series describes the clinical response and safety of SV in patients with HFrEF receiving MHD; Case Presentation: Four male patients with HFrEF undergoing MHD were treated with SV and followed for 12 months. Baseline evaluation showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35.5%, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) of 118.5 mL, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of 185.7 mL, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) of 52.7 mmHg, and NT-proBNP levels above 35,000 pg/mL in all patients. After 12 months of SV therapy, LVEF improved to 53.7%, corresponding to a 51.4% relative increase from baseline. Reverse cardiac remodeling was observed, with LVESV decreasing to 58.2 mL and LVEDV to 110 mL, together with reductions in left ventricular dimensions. PASP decreased to 32 mmHg, and NT-proBNP levels declined to 7261.7 pg/mL. Blood pressure improved, serum potassium remained stable at 4.95 mmol/L, and no severe hyperkalemia, intradialytic hypotension, post-dialysis hypotension, or heart failure-related hospitalization occurred; Conclusions: In this case series, SV was associated with improved cardiac function, reverse remodeling, pulmonary pressure reduction, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with HFrEF undergoing MHD. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for SV in selected dialysis patients and support further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mocka et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and end-stage kidney disease (n=4). Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (51.4% relative increase). Sacubitril/valsartan therapy for 12 months improved mean LVEF from 35.5% to 53.7% and reduced NT-proBNP levels in 4 male patients with HFrEF undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: