Why the study?
To evaluate whether aortic stenosis-related cardiac damage staging is associated with the occurrence of conduction system disorders after TAVI.
Does AS-related cardiac damage staging (ASCDS) predict the occurrence of conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI in patients with severe AS?
Does AS-related cardiac damage staging (ASCDS) predict the occurrence of conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI in patients with severe AS?
AS-related cardiac damage staging (ASCDS) can help identify patients at higher risk for conduction disorders and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI.
ASCDS may stratify conduction risk after TAVI; leaves open whether staging should guide pre-procedural planning.
Recently, a staging system using 4 grades has been proposed to quantify the extent of cardiac damage associated with aortic stenosis (AS), namely AS-related cardiac damage staging (ASCDS). ASCDS is independently associated with all-cause mortality and important clinical outcomes. To evaluate whether it might be associated with the occurrence of conduction system disorders after TAVI, a total of 119 symptomatic patients with severe AS who underwent a TAVI were categorized according to ASCDS: group 1 (13.5%): no or LV damage; group 2 (58.8%): left atrial/mitral valve damage, atrial fibrillation (AF); group 3 (27.7%): low-flow state, pulmonary vasculature/tricuspid valve/RV damage. After TAVI, 34% of patients exhibited LBBB and 10% high-degree atrioventricular block (HD-AVB). No patient in group 1 developed HD-AVB whereas new LBBB was frequent in groups 2 and 3. Twenty-one patients presented with paroxysmal AF with a higher rate for each group increment (group 1: n = 0, 0%; group 2: n = 11, 15.7%; group 3: n = 10, 30.3%) (p = 0.012). Patients in group 3 had the higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) (group 1: n = 1, 6.3%; group 2: n = 7, 10%; group 3: n = 9, 27.3%) (p = 0.012). In conclusion, ASCDS might help identify patients at higher risk of conduction disorders and PPMI requirement after TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: