Why the study?
Does smoking cue exposure alter prefrontal functional connectivity measured by fNIRS in occasional smokers compared to controls?
Does smoking cue exposure alter prefrontal functional connectivity measured by fNIRS in occasional smokers compared to controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
fNIRS can effectively capture prefrontal hemodynamic activity and functional connectivity involved in cue reactivity during smoking cue exposure.
Cue reactivity (CR) is an important concept for relapse in substance use disorders (SUD). Although cue exposure (CE) therapy is discussed as relapse prevention, current approaches still need improvement considering its efficacy. From a neurobiological perspective, CR is related to an over-activation in sensitized subcortical structures, their projections to motivationally relevant cortical structures (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, OFC) and deficient prefrontal inhibitory control. Therefore, we analyzed prefrontal cortical activation and its relation to craving during smoking CE. We focused on the OFC-as a projection area of sensitized subcortical structures-due its importance in the processing of reinforcement value and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) based on its importance for behavioral inhibition. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to assess hemodynamics in prefrontal regions during smoking CE in 24 subjects (n = 12 occasional smokers, n = 12 controls). Subjective craving intensity (minimum craving as marker of baseline inhibition, range as marker of inhibition time course) was additionally assessed. Craving ratings indicated that CR was elicited solely in smokers, not controls. Those subjective ratings correlated with hemodynamic activity in OFC (craving range) and dlPFC (minimum craving). OFC activation was found earlier throughout the CE in smokers compared to controls. Connectivity (seed-based correlation) between OFC and dlPFC was increased in smokers. fNIRS can capture prefrontal hemodynamic activity involved in CR elicited during CE and is therefore a promising method to investigate CR and its implications for relapse prevention in SUD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kroczek et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: