Why the study?
Traditional volumetric parameters have limitations in detecting subtle LV systolic dysfunction, whereas GLS and myocardial work allow more sensitive assessment of ventricular mechanics.
Does isometric handgrip exercise alter left ventricular mechanics assessed by global longitudinal strain and myocardial work in healthy adults?
Does isometric handgrip exercise alter left ventricular mechanics assessed by global longitudinal strain and myocardial work in healthy adults?
Isometric handgrip exercise induces acute changes in left ventricular mechanics, including decreased global longitudinal strain and increased myocardial work, reflecting a physiological response to pressure overload.
Acute GLS and work index shifts during handgrip reflect load-dependent mechanics in healthy adults; leaves open added clinical value beyond LVEF.
Background: Traditional volumetric parameters have limitations in detecting subtle left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work (MW) allow a more sensitive assessment of ventricular mechanics.Objectives: To evaluate changes in GLS and MW indices during isometric handgrip exercise compared with resting conditions.Methods: A total of 30 healthy individuals (29.3 ± 6.1 years; 50% male) were included in the sample.Echocardiography was performed at rest and during handgrip exercise (30%-40% of maximal strength).GLS, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and MW indices were assessed: i) global work index (GWI), ii) global constructive work (GCW), iii) global wasted work (GWW), and iv) global work efficiency (GWE).Comparisons were performed using paired tests.Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: Handgrip exercise increased both systolic blood pressure (115 ± 16 vs 133 ± 18 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and diastolic blood pressure (69 ± 9 vs 79 ± 13 mmHg; p = 0.0002), without significant changes in LVEF (64.8% vs 64.4%; p = 0.62).A decrease in GLS was observed (20.38% ± 2.57% vs 19.60% ± 2.52%; p = 0.028), along with increases in GWI (+244 mmHg%; p = 0.0002), GCW (+313 mmHg%; p < 0.0001), and GWW (+52 mmHg%; p = 0.0008) as well as a decrease in GWE (94.8% ± 1.8% vs 93.6% ± 2.5%; p = 0.022).Conclusions: Handgrip exercise induces measurable ventricular mechanical changes in healthy individuals, reflecting a physiological response to acute pressure overload.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: