Why the study?
Although GLS is a sensitive marker of intrinsic LV dysfunction, it is afterload dependent, prompting the hypothesis that GLS during handgrip exercise could be a more sensitive marker of intrinsic myocardial dysfunction.
Does handgrip exercise-stress echocardiography identify intrinsic myocardial dysfunction via changes in global longitudinal strain in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction?
Does handgrip exercise-stress echocardiography identify intrinsic myocardial dysfunction via changes in global longitudinal strain in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction?
A paradoxical increase in global longitudinal strain during handgrip exercise may serve as a marker for advanced LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Paradoxical GLS rise during handgrip may flag advanced diastolic dysfunction in preserved-EF patients; leaves open whether exercise GLS refines intrinsic LV assessment.
Background Although global longitudinal strain (GLS) is recognized as a sensitive marker of intrinsic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, its afterload dependency has also been pointed. We hypothesized that GLS during handgrip exercise could be more sensitive marker of intrinsic myocardial dysfunction. Methods Handgrip exercise-stress echocardiography was performed in 90 cardiovascular disease patients with preserved LV ejection fraction. LV diastolic function was graded according to the guidelines. Diastolic wall stress (DWS) and ratio of left atrial (LA) volume index to late-diastolic mitral annular velocity (LAVI/a¢) were measured at rest as LV stiffness. As well, LA strains were measured to assess LA function. GLS was expressed as absolute value and significant changes in GLS by handgrip exercise was defined as changes over prespecified mean absolute test-retest variability (2.65%). Results While mean value of GLS did not change by the exercise, substantial patients showed significant changes in GLS: decreased (group I, n=28), unchanged (group II, n=34), and increased (group III, n=28). Unexpectedly, patients in group I did not show any clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, while those in group III were characterized by elevated natriuretic peptide levels, blunted heart rate response to handgrip exercise, and advanced LV diastolic dysfunction. Multivariable analyses revealed that DWS, left atrial booster strain, and grade II or more diastolic dysfunction determined the increase in GLS even after adjustment for elevated natriuretic peptides and the changes in heart rate by the exercise. Conclusion Paradoxical increase in GLS by handgrip exercise could be associated with advanced LV diastolic dysfunction in cardiovascular patients with preserved LV ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motoi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: