Key result
Isometric handgrip exercise increases global myocardial work index by ~244 mmHg% while mildly reducing GLS.
Why the study?
LVEF is limited by load dependency and may miss subtle mechanical adaptations, prompting this study to characterise LV mechanical responses to acute pressure overload from isometric handgrip exercise using GLS and myocardial work indices in healthy adults.
Does sustained isometric handgrip exercise alter left ventricular global longitudinal strain and myocardial work indices compared to rest in healthy adults?
Observational (n=30)
Does sustained isometric handgrip exercise alter left ventricular global longitudinal strain and myocardial work indices compared to rest in healthy adults?
Myocardial work indices (particularly GWI and GCW) are more sensitive than global longitudinal strain or ejection fraction for detecting acute left ventricular contractile adaptation to pressure overload during isometric handgrip exercise in healthy adults.
Myocardial work indices may detect acute LV adaptations to pressure overload missed by GLS or LVEF in health; leaves open clinical utility pending validation in disease.
Background Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is limited by load dependency and may fail to identify subtle mechanical adaptations. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work (MW) integrate deformation and afterload, providing a more comprehensive assessment of LV mechanics. Isometric handgrip exercise represents a simple and reproducible model of acute pressure overload. Purpose To characterise LV mechanical responses to isometric handgrip exercise using GLS and myocardial work indices in healthy adults. Methods Thirty healthy individuals (mean age 29.3 ± 6.1 years; 50% male) underwent transthoracic echocardiography at rest and during sustained handgrip at 30–40% of maximal voluntary contraction. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. GLS, global myocardial work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE) were derived from non-invasive pressure–strain loops. Paired comparisons and effect sizes were calculated. Results Handgrip elicited a significant haemodynamic response, with systolic blood pressure increasing from 115 ± 16 to 133 ± 18 mmHg and heart rate from 72 ± 12 to 82 ± 10 bpm (both p<0.0001). LV ejection fraction remained unchanged (64.8% vs 64.4%; p=0.62). GLS showed a mild reduction (20.4 ± 2.6% vs 19.6 ± 2.5%; p=0.028; Cohen’s d = 0.42), mainly in basal segments. In contrast, MW indices increased substantially: GWI rose from 1810 ± 322 to 2054 ± 403 mmHg% (p=0.0002; d = 0.77), GCW from 2172 ± 371 to 2486 ± 453 mmHg% (p<0.0001; d = 1.05), and GWW from 108 ± 44 to 160 ± 76 mmHg% (p=0.0008; d = 0.68). GWE showed a small reduction (94.8 ± 1.8% vs 93.6 ± 2.5%; p=0.022; d = 0.44), remaining within physiological limits. Segmental analysis demonstrated greater MW increases in basal and mid-ventricular segments, with no significant apical changes. Conclusion(s) In healthy adults, isometric handgrip induces preserved ejection fraction, mild load-related GLS reduction and marked increases in myocardial work. MW indices, particularly GWI and GCW, are more sensitive than GLS or ejection fraction for detecting acute LV contractile adaptation to pressure overload. Handgrip combined with myocardial work analysis is a robust approach for assessing LV mechanical reserve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy adults undergoing acute pressure overload (n=30). Sustained isometric handgrip exercise vs. Resting baseline was evaluated on Global myocardial work index (GWI) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) (Cohen's d 0.77, p=0.0002). Isometric handgrip exercise markedly increased global myocardial work index (2054 vs 1810 mmHg%; p=0.0002) while mildly reducing global longitudinal strain (19.6% vs 20.4%; p=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: