Why the study?
Does an intensive lifestyle change program improve cardiovascular risk factors in patients with elevated risk factors without clinical CVD compared to those with clinical CVD?
Does an intensive lifestyle change program improve cardiovascular risk factors in patients with elevated risk factors without clinical CVD compared to those with clinical CVD?
Intensive lifestyle change programs provide significant cardiovascular risk reduction benefits for primary prevention in high-risk individuals without clinical CVD.
May support intensive lifestyle programs in high-risk primary prevention; leaves open causal superiority over secondary prevention without randomized confirmation.
Intensive lifestyle modification programs are intended to stabilize or promote regression of coronary artery disease; however, clinical response is often nonuniform, complicating appropriate utilization of resources and prediction of outcome. This study assessed physiological and psychological benefits to 72 persons participating in a prospective, nonrandomized, four-component lifestyle change program and compared response between patients with clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) and patients with elevated risk factors for CVD but without clinical manifestations of disease. Subjects entering the program due to elevated risk factor levels alone demonstrated equal or greater benefit, in terms of improvement in primary CVD risk factors and reduction in measures of coronary disease risk developed in the Framingham Heart Study, than those with clinical CVD. These findings suggest that intensive lifestyle change programs may be important for primary prevention in individuals at increased risk of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellsworth et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: