C-PCR provides a rapid (2-5 days), sensitive, and specific screening method for enteric viruses in environmental samples of low toxicity with high viral concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May accelerate environmental virus screening; leaves open clinical diagnostic adoption pending validation studies.
AIMS: The aims of this study were to establish an integrated culture-polymerase chain reaction (C-PCR) method for detection of enteric viruses in environmental samples, and to evaluate it for sensitivity, speed and provision of virus infectivity data. METHODS AND RESULTS: C-PCR, direct reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, PCR and plaque assay methods were used to detect enteroviruses and adenoviruses in seeded and naturally contaminated environmental samples. Using C-PCR, infectious enterovirus presence was confirmed in 3 d and adenovirus presence in 5 d, compared with up to 10 d required by conventional cell culture methods. CONCLUSIONS: C-PCR was the preferred method for detection of enteric viruses in environmental samples containing high viral concentrations. It was less successful for samples with low viral concentrations or containing toxic materials or inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: C-PCR provides sensitive, specific results within 2-5 d and is useful as a rapid screen for environmental samples of low toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greening et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: