Why the study?
Adherence to secondary prevention measures affects prognosis in patients with CAD, but adherence behaviors change over time.
What are the adherence trajectories to secondary prevention measures and their predictors among Chinese patients with CAD after PCI?
What are the adherence trajectories to secondary prevention measures and their predictors among Chinese patients with CAD after PCI?
Adherence to secondary prevention measures among Chinese CAD patients post-PCI follows multiple trajectories, highlighting the need for targeted support considering self-efficacy and health literacy.
Adherence trajectories vary widely in CAD; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions, prospective validation needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to secondary prevention measures among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) affects patient prognosis, whereas patients' adherence behaviors change over time. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify adherence trajectories to secondary prevention measures including medication-taking and a heart-healthy lifestyle and to estimate predictors of adherence trajectories among patients with CAD. METHODS: This longitudinal study enrolled 698 patients with CAD who received a percutaneous coronary intervention in China. Demographics, clinical characteristics, adherence to secondary prevention measures, and patient-related factors including disease knowledge, self-efficacy, and health literacy were measured during hospitalization. Adherence behaviors were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after discharge. Group-based trajectory models estimated adherence trajectories, and multinomial logistic regression identified trajectory group predictors. RESULTS: Four trajectory groups were identified for medication-taking adherence: sustained adherence (39.9%), increasing and then decreasing adherence (23.1%), increasing adherence (23.4%), and nonadherence (13.6%). The 3 adherence trajectory groups for a heart-healthy lifestyle were sustained adherence (59.7%), increasing adherence (28.3%), and nonadherence (12.0%). Married patients were more likely (odds ratio [OR], 3.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-7.52) to have sustained adherence to medication-taking. However, patients with higher disease knowledge were less likely (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99) to be adherent. Patients who were not working (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) had higher self-efficacy (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37). Those with higher health literacy (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38) were more likely to have sustained adherence to a heart-healthy lifestyle. However, patients having no coronary stents (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.70) were less likely to have done so. CONCLUSIONS: Trajectories of adherence to secondary prevention measures among mainland Chinese patients with CAD are multipatterned. Healthcare providers should formulate targeted adherence support, which considers the influence of disease knowledge, self-efficacy, and health literacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: