Key result
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma survivors had a 3.6-fold increased risk for myocardial infarction and a 4.9-fold increased risk for congestive heart failure compared to the general population.
Why the study?
Cardiotoxicity represents the most frequent cause of long-term morbidity and mortality in classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survivors.
What is the incidence of cardiovascular disease and the optimal monitoring strategy in survivors of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?
Systematic Review (n=23)
What is the incidence of cardiovascular disease and the optimal monitoring strategy in survivors of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?
Effect estimate: Risk 3.6 for MI, 4.9 for CHF
Survivors of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma face a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease, highlighting the need for tailored screening and monitoring programs based on cumulative treatment exposures.
Supports routine cardiac screening in classical Hodgkin lymphoma survivors; extends evidence on long-term treatment-related cardiotoxicity.
Cardiotoxicity represents the most frequent cause with higher morbidity and mortality among long-term sequelae affecting classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The multidisciplinary team of Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) researchers, with the methodological guide of Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, conducted a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in order to analyze the following aspects of cHL and DLBCL survivorship: (i) incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD); (ii) risk of long-term CVD with the use of less cardiotoxic therapies (reduced-field radiotherapy and liposomal doxorubicin); and (iii) preferable cardiovascular monitoring for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary heart disease (CHD) and valvular disease (VHD). After the screening of 659 abstracts and related 113 full-text papers, 23 publications were eligible for data extraction and included in the final sample. There was an increased risk for CVD in cHL survivors of 3.6 for myocardial infarction and 4.9 for congestive heart failure (CHF) in comparison to the general population; the risk increased over the years of follow-up. In addition, DLBCL patients presented a 29% increased risk for CHF. New radiotherapy techniques suggested reduced risk of late CVD, but only dosimetric studies were available. The optimal monitoring of LV function by 2D-STE echocardiography should be structured according to individual CV risk, mainly considering as risk factors a cumulative doxorubicine dose >250 mg per square meter (m2) and mediastinal radiotherapy >30 Gy, age at treatment <25 years and age at evaluation >60 years, evaluating LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, and global circumferential strain. The evaluation for asymptomatic CHD should be offered starting from the 10th year after mediastinal RT, considering ECG, stress echo, or coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. Given the suggested increased risks of cardiovascular outcomes in lymphoma survivors compared to the general population, tailored screening and prevention programs may be warranted to offset the future burden of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliva et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors (n=23). Classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survivorship vs. General population was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure) (Risk 3.6 for MI, 4.9 for CHF). Classical Hodgkin lymphoma survivors had a 3.6-fold increased risk for myocardial infarction and a 4.9-fold increased risk for congestive heart failure compared to the general population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: