Key result
This review highlights recent advancements and summarizes selected papers published in the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.
Why the study?
Hemodynamic management is central to operating room and ICU care, prompting ongoing research into monitoring technologies, cardiovascular pathophysiology, and treatment strategies.
This end-of-year summary provides an overview of key 2018 publications in hemodynamic monitoring, highlighting advancements in non-invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring, fluid responsiveness, and closed-loop systems.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Hemodynamic management is a mainstay of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). In order to optimize patient treatment, researchers investigate monitoring technologies, cardiovascular (patho-) physiology, and hemodynamic treatment strategies. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) is a well-established and recognized platform for publishing research in this field. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and summarize selected papers published in the JCMC in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights 2018 hemodynamic monitoring papers; extends literature summaries but leaves open current practice translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saugel et al. (2019) conducted a review in Hemodynamic monitoring and management. Hemodynamic monitoring and management was evaluated. This review highlights recent advancements and summarizes selected papers published in the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: