Key result
Recent reviews highlight non-invasive CO monitoring limitations and the potential of peripheral perfusion index and AI.
Why the study?
Innovative continuous and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring solutions require profound validation before improving perioperative care.
This review summarizes recent innovations and publications regarding continuous and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in perioperative and critical care settings.
Urges validation of perfusion index and AI before clinical integration; leaves open their role in standard hemodynamic monitoring.
Hemodynamic monitoring and management are essential pillars of perioperative care. Innovative continuous and non-invasive monitoring solutions require profound validation before they may improve perioperative care. New monitoring tools are changing how we monitor and manage hemodynamics in surgical and critically ill patients and many of these are published in the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC). In this What-is-new review, we will highlight some of the papers focusing on what is new in the area of hemodynamic monitoring and management based on papers published in the JCMC in 2020 and 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flick et al. (2022) conducted a review in Hemodynamic monitoring and management. Hemodynamic monitoring techniques was evaluated. Hemodynamic monitoring advancements published in 2020 and 2021 highlight the limitations of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and the potential of the peripheral perfusion index and artificial intelligence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: