Key result
Catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism compared to medical therapy (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.43-0.52; P<0.001).
Why the study?
It remained controversial whether catheter ablation for AF improves survival and other outcomes in patients with AF.
Does catheter ablation reduce the composite of death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism in real-world Asian patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation compared to medical therapy?
Cohort (n=27,955)
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce the composite of death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism in real-world Asian patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation compared to medical therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.47 (95% CI 0.43–0.52)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.5% vs 6.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a large real-world Asian cohort, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower risks of mortality, heart failure admission, and stroke compared to medical therapy.
Supports ablation benefit in AF; hypothesis-generating from observational data and requires RCT confirmation.
Background It is still controversial whether catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) improves survival and other outcomes in patients with AF. This study evaluated whether ablation reduces death and other events in nationwide real‐world Asian patients with AF . Methods and Results From the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, 194 928 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed AF were treated with ablation or medical therapy (antiarrhythmic or rate control drugs) between January 1, 2005, and December 1, 2015. Among these patients, this study included 9185 with ablation and 18 770 with medical therapy. The time at risk was counted from the first medical therapy, and ablation was analyzed as a time‐varying covariate. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to correct for differences between the groups. After weighting, the 2 cohorts had similar background characteristics. During a median (25th, 75th percentiles) follow‐up of 43 (19, 81) months, ablation of AF was associated with lower incidence and risk of composite outcome, including death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism (2.5 and 6.4 per 100 person‐years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI , 0.43–0.52; P <0.001), all‐cause death (1.0 and 3.6 per 100 person‐years; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.36–0.47; P <0.001), heart failure admission (0.7 and 1.9 per 100 person‐years; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.37–0.50), and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (1.1 and 2.8 per 100 person‐years; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.34–0.44) than medical therapy. Conclusions Ablation may be associated with lower risk of death, heart failure admission, and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism in real‐world Asian patients with AF .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=27,955). Catheter ablation vs. Medical therapy (antiarrhythmic or rate control drugs) was evaluated on Composite outcome, including death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43-0.52, p=<0.001). Catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of death, heart failure admission, and stroke/systemic embolism compared to medical therapy (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.43-0.52; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: