Why the study?
To investigate the relationship between body mass index and clinical outcomes in patients with AF.
Does body mass index influence clinical outcomes and the relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=21,028)
Double-blind, double-dummy
1:1:1 ratio to warfarin, higher-dose edoxaban (60 mg), or lower-dose edoxaban (30 mg)
Yes
Does body mass index influence clinical outcomes and the relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, higher BMI is independently associated with lower risks of stroke/systemic embolism and death but higher bleeding risk, while edoxaban maintains consistent pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety compared to warfarin across BMI categories from 18.5 to >40 kg/m².
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reinforces obesity paradox in anticoagulated AF; extends RCT data on BMI associations without altering edoxaban-warfarin choice.
AIMS: To investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with AF were randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) or edoxaban. The cohort (N = 21 028) included patients across BMI categories (kg/m2): underweight (<18.5) in 0.8%, normal (18.5 to <25) in 21.4%, overweight (25 to <30) in 37.6%, moderately obese (30 to <35) in 24.8%, severely obese (35 to <40) in 10.0%, and very severely obese (≥40) in 5.5%. In an adjusted analysis, higher BMI (continuous, per 5 kg/m2 increase) was significantly and independently associated with lower risks of stroke/systemic embolic event (SEE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, P = 0.0001], ischaemic stroke/SEE (HR 0.87, P < 0.0001), and death (HR 0.91, P < 0.0001), but with increased risks of major (HR 1.06, P = 0.025) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.05, P = 0.0007). There was a significant interaction between sex and increasing BMI category, with lower risk of ischaemic stroke/SEE in males and increased risk of bleeding in women. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Factor Xa activity were similar across BMI groups >18.5 kg/m2, while time in therapeutic range for warfarin improved significantly as BMI increased (P < 0.0001). The effects of edoxaban vs. warfarin on stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and net clinical outcome were similar across BMI groups. CONCLUSION: An increased BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of stroke/SEE, better survival, but increased risk of bleeding. The efficacy and safety profiles of edoxaban were similar across BMI categories ranging from 18.5 to >40.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boriani et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation across body mass index (BMI) categories (n=21,028). Higher body mass index (per 5 kg/m² increase) in patients treated with edoxaban or warfarin vs. Normal BMI (18.5 to <25 kg/m²) / continuous lower BMI was evaluated on Composite of adjudicated stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) (HR 0.88 per 5 kg/m² increase, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: