Key result
In diabetic hypertensive patients, 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease (OR 1.32) after adjusting for clinic blood pressure.
Why the study?
Is ambulatory blood pressure more strongly associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease than clinic blood pressure in diabetic hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=568)
No
Is ambulatory blood pressure more strongly associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease than clinic blood pressure in diabetic hypertensive patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.32 (95% CI 1.2–1.93)
p-value: p=<0.05
In diabetic hypertensive patients, ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in its association with prevalent cardiovascular disease, a relationship that may be mediated by aldosterone excess.
Supports ambulatory BP assessment beyond clinic readings in diabetic hypertension; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
The present study was to compare the association between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic BP (CBP) with prevalent cardiovascular diseases (CVD); and the underlying mechanism would also be investigated concurrently.Diabetic hypertensive patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups based on presence of CVD. Twenty-four hour-ABP monitoring was performed and between-group differences were evaluated and logistic regression analysis was conducted.A total of 568 diabetic hypertensive patients were enrolled, and the mean age was 60.8 years, male accounted for 67.8%. Mean durations of diabetes mellitus and hypertension were 6.1 ± 2.7 and 5.4 ± 3.3 years, respectively, and 20.6% had prevalent CVD. Compared to patients without CVD, patients with CVD had significantly higher body mass index (BMI), plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), and serum sodium level. No significant between-group differences in CBP were observed. However, 24 hour-SBP, daytime-SBP and nighttime-SBP were all significantly higher in patients with CVD compared to those without CVD. Pearson correlation analysis showed that BMI was positively correlated with PAC and serum sodium level. Logistic regression analyses showed that the association between clinic SBP and DBP with CVD were progressively attenuated to nonsignificant. In contrast, both ambulatory SBP and DBP were independently associated with CVD. However, after being further adjusted for PAC, no significant association was observed between ambulatory SBP and CVD.In diabetic hypertensive patients, ABP is superior to CBP in relation to CVD. The association between ambulatory SBP and CVD may be dependent on aldosterone excess.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetic hypertensive patients (n=568). Ambulatory blood pressure vs. Clinic blood pressure was evaluated on Prevalent cardiovascular disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.20-1.93, p=<0.05). In diabetic hypertensive patients, 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease (OR 1.32) after adjusting for clinic blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: