Key result
Habitual physical activity in elderly women was associated with greater resting carotid baroreflex-heart rate gains (-0.146 vs -0.088 bpm/mmHg; P<0.001) compared to sedentary women.
Why the study?
The impact of habitual physical activity on vagal-cardiac function and baroreflex sensitivity in elderly women is poorly characterized.
Does habitual physical activity improve vagal-cardiac modulation and carotid baroreflex function in elderly women?
Observational (n=16)
Does habitual physical activity improve vagal-cardiac modulation and carotid baroreflex function in elderly women?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.146% vs -0.088%
p-value: p=<0.001
Habitual physical activity in elderly women is associated with augmented tonic vagal modulation and dynamic vagal responses, potentially protecting against age-related cardiac electrical and hemodynamic instability.
May link habitual activity to better vagal modulation in elderly women; leaves open causality and outcome impact.
The impact of habitual physical activity on vagal-cardiac function and baroreflex sensitivity in elderly women is poorly characterized. This study compared vagal-cardiac modulation and carotid baroreflex (CBR) function in eight physically active (67.6 ± 1.9 years; peak O 2 uptake 29.1 ± 2.5 mL/min/kg) versus eight sedentary (67.3 ± 1.8 years; peak O 2 uptake 18.6 ± 0.9 mL/min/kg) elderly women. Heart rate (HR) variabilities and maximal changes of HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) elicited by 5-s pressure pulses between +40 and −80 mmHg applied to the carotid sinus were measured at rest and during carotid baroreceptor unloading effected by −15 mmHg lower-body negative pressure (LBNP). HR variability was greater in active than sedentary women in both low (0.998 ± 0.286 versus 0.255 ± 0.063 bpm 2 ; P = 0.036) and high (0.895 ± 0.301 versus 0.156 ± 0.045 bpm 2 ; P = 0.044) frequency domains. CBR-HR gains (bpm/mmHg) were greater (fitness factor P < 0.001) in active versus sedentary women at rest (−0.146 ± 0.014 versus −0.088 ± 0.011) and during LBNP (−0.105 ± 0.014 versus −0.065 ± 0.008). CBR-MAP gains (mmHg/mmHg) tended to be greater (fitness factor P = 0.077) in active versus sedentary women at rest (−0.132 ± 0.013 versus −0.110 ± 0.011) and during LBNP (−0.129 ± 0.015 versus −0.113 ± 0.013). However, LBNP did not potentiate CBR-MAP gains in either sedentary or active women (LBNP factor P = 0.94), and it depressed CBR-HR gains in both groups (LBNP factor P = 0.003). CBR-HR gains in the sedentary women did not differ (sex factor P = 0.65) from gains reported in age-matched sedentary men, although CBR-MAP gains tended to be greater (sex factor P = 0.109) in the men. Thus, tonic vagal modulation indicated by HR variability and dynamic vagal responses assessed by CBR-HR gain were augmented in physically active women. Enhanced vagal-cardiac function may protect against senescence-associated cardiac electrical and hemodynamic instability in elderly women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy aging (n=16). Habitual physical activity vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Carotid baroreflex-heart rate (CBR-HR) gains at rest (p=<0.001). Habitual physical activity in elderly women was associated with greater resting carotid baroreflex-heart rate gains (-0.146 vs -0.088 bpm/mmHg; P<0.001) compared to sedentary women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: