Key result
Abnormal RV voltage mapping predicts a ~43% rate of ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias.
Why the study?
To test whether 3-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping can aid in differentiating idiopathic RVOT tachycardia from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia.
Does 3-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping identify concealed ARVC/D in patients with apparent idiopathic RVOT tachycardia?
Observational (n=27)
Does 3-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping identify concealed ARVC/D in patients with apparent idiopathic RVOT tachycardia?
Absolute Event Rate: 42.9% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.016
3D electroanatomical voltage mapping can identify concealed ARVC/D in patients presenting with apparent idiopathic RVOT tachycardia, predicting a higher risk of life-threatening arrhythmias.
OBJECTIVES: We tested whether 3-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping (EVM) may help in the differential diagnosis between idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D). BACKGROUND: Right ventricular EVM has been demonstrated to reliably identify low-voltage regions ("electroanatomical scar"), which in patients with ARVC/D correspond to areas of fibrofatty myocardial replacement. METHODS: The study population comprised 27 patients (15 men and 12 women, age 33.9 +/- 8 years) with RVOT tachycardia and no echocardiographic/angiographic evidence of right ventricular (RV) dilation/dysfunction, who underwent EVM and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for characterization of ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate before catheter ablation. RESULTS: Electroanatomical voltage mapping was normal in 20 of 27 patients (74%, group A), with electrogram voltage >1.5 mV throughout the RV. The other 7 patients (26%, group B) showed >/=1 (1.4 +/- 07) RV electroanatomical scar area(s) (bipolar voltage <0.5 mV) that correlated with fibrofatty myocardial replacement at EMB (p < 0.001). Clinical predictors of RV scar were right precordial QRS prolongation (p < 0.001) and VT inducibility (p = 0.001). Catheter ablation successfully eliminated VT in 18 of 20 patients (90%). During a follow-up of 41 +/- 8 months, 3 of 7 patients (43%) from group B received an implantable defibrillator because of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, compared with no patients from group A (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: An early/minor form of ARVC/D may mimic idiopathic RVOT tachycardia. Electroanatomical voltage mapping is able to identify RVOT tachycardia due to concealed ARVC/D by detecting RVOT electroanatomical scars that correlate with fibrofatty myocardial replacement at EMB and predispose to sudden arrhythmic death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corrado et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia (n=27). Abnormal electroanatomical voltage mapping (RV scar) vs. Normal electroanatomical voltage mapping was evaluated on Implantable defibrillator placement for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.016). Abnormal electroanatomical voltage mapping identifying RV scar correlated with fibrofatty replacement and predicted implantable defibrillator placement for ventricular arrhythmias (42.9% vs 0%, P=0.016).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: