Why the study?
What is the long-term incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with different types of atrial fibrillation?
What is the long-term incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with different types of atrial fibrillation?
Thromboembolic complications in AF occur more frequently in patients with underlying heart disease and chronic AF, but rarely in lone AF, highlighting the need for sufficient anticoagulation in high-risk patients.
Supports subtype-specific thromboembolic risk assessment in AF; extends prior cohorts but remains hypothesis-generating without randomized confirmation.
The incidence of thromboembolic complications among 288 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were followed up during an average period of 7.2 years was examined retrospectively. The annual incidence of thromboembolic complications was 1.6% in total, 1.7% in valvular heart disease (n=128), and 2.1% in non-valvular heart disease (n=117). No thromboembolism occurred in lone AF (n=43), defined as the complete absence of any underlying disease. The type of AF before embolic attack was chronic in 26 cases and paroxysmal in 6 cases. The cardiac rhythm at the time of the embolic attack was AF, except in 2 cases in which ECG was not recorded. In all patients with thromboembolic complications who were receiving antithrombotic therapy during the follow-up, the anticoagulant effect just before the embolic attack was found to be insufficient. Major bleeding was not observed in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Thromboembolism in AF in long-term follow-up tends to occur more frequently in patients with underlying heart disease and in those with chronic AF compared rather than paroxysmal AF; it rarely occurs in lone AF. We should not hesitate to administer sufficient anticoagulant therapy in AF patients who are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toda et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: