BACKGROUND: We and others have shown that expression of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte effector gene perforin in the peripheral blood is a strong predictor of acute rejection in the early posttransplant period. In the present study we investigated whether interleukin (IL)-18, an immunostimulatory gene that up-regulates perforin-dependent cytotoxicity and promotes tissue damage through other noncytotoxic T-lymphocyte mechanisms alone or in combination with perforin gene expression, may serve as a better predictor of renal allograft rejection in the first weeks after transplantation. METHODS: Peripheral blood was collected twice weekly, and gene expression was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Recipients with acute rejection (n = 17) showed higher levels of perforin and IL-18 transcript on days 5 to 7, 8 to 10, and 11 to 13, compared with patients without rejection (n = 37, P < 0.01 in all cases). Rejection diagnosis using gene expression criteria was possible 1 to 32 days before traditional diagnosis (median 11 days). High specificity was associated with IL-18 expression (72%-93%), and high sensitivity was associated with perforin expression (63%-90%). Positive predictive value was optimized (78%-100%) by using combined up-regulation in both genes as a diagnostic criterion (double-positive). Using high expression in "either or both" genes as a diagnostic criterion yielded high sensitivity (82%-91%) and negative predictive value (91%-96%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that combined perforin and IL-18 gene expression measurements are useful tools for the recognition of graft rejection in its earliest stages. Serial measurements could be implemented as a monitoring system to identify patients at higher risk of rejection, making them candidates for biopsy or prophylactic increases in immunosuppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: