Key result
High hyperaemic microvascular resistance (>1.9 mmHg/cm/s) was significantly associated with the presence of myocardial ischaemia on stress testing (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.4; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does high hyperaemic microvascular resistance associate with the presence of myocardial ischaemia on non-invasive stress testing in patients with coronary lesions?
Observational (n=228)
Does high hyperaemic microvascular resistance associate with the presence of myocardial ischaemia on non-invasive stress testing in patients with coronary lesions?
Odds Ratio: 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4)
p-value: p=<0.001
High hyperaemic microvascular resistance (>1.9 mmHg/cm/s) is significantly associated with the presence of myocardial ischaemia on non-invasive stress testing, validating its utility in identifying microvascular functional abnormalities.
May refine ischaemia evaluation in coronary lesions; hypothesis-generating for microvascular resistance thresholds in prospective studies.
AIMS: It has been argued that hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR), defined as the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to flow velocity, is overestimated in the presence of a coronary stenosis compared to actual microvascular resistance (MR), due to neglecting collateral flow. We aimed to test the hypothesis that HMR allows accurate identification of microvascular functional abnormalities by evaluating the association between high or low HMR and the presence of myocardial ischaemia on non-invasive stress testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was performed in 228 patients, with 299 lesions to identify reversible myocardial ischaemia. Intracoronary distal pressure and flow velocity were assessed during adenosine-induced hyperaemia (20-40 µg, intracoronary) to determine hyperaemic stenosis resistance (HSR) and HMR. HMR >1.9 mmHg/cm/s was defined as high. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) for myocardial ischaemia for lesions associated with high compared to low HMR was 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-4.4; p<0.001) overall, 3.3 (95% CI: 1.2-9.0; p=0.02) for lesions with HSR >0.8 mmHg/cm/s, and 1.3 (95% CI: 0.6-2.9; p=0.52) for lesions with HSR ≤0.8 mmHg/cm/s. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of myocardial ischaemia in the presence of high HMR, uncorrected for collateral flow, demonstrates that HMR is reflective of an increase in actual MR, identifying pertinent pathophysiological alterations in the microvasculature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nolte et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Myocardial ischaemia (n=228). High hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR >1.9 mmHg/cm/s) vs. Low hyperaemic microvascular resistance was evaluated on Myocardial ischaemia on non-invasive stress testing (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4, p=<0.001). High hyperaemic microvascular resistance (>1.9 mmHg/cm/s) was significantly associated with the presence of myocardial ischaemia on stress testing (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.4; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: