Key result
Ultrasound carotid duplex detected a higher percentage of stenosis and more plaques than computed tomography angiography in patients with ischemic stroke (9 vs 20 cases with no plaques).
Why the study?
Carotid artery stenosis is a major cause of ischemic stroke, prompting evaluation of the efficacy of CTA compared to ultrasound carotid duplex for detecting and assessing carotid artery disease.
Does computed tomography angiography (CTA) compared to ultrasound carotid duplex (USCD) improve the evaluation of carotid artery disease in patients with ischemic stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does computed tomography angiography (CTA) compared to ultrasound carotid duplex (USCD) improve the evaluation of carotid artery disease in patients with ischemic stroke?
The combination of USCD and CTA is recommended for evaluating carotid artery disease in ischemic stroke patients, as CTA is sensitive for stenosis degree while USCD provides more descriptive plaque data.
CTA may aid carotid assessment in ischemic stroke; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives This work aimed to assess the efficacy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in comparison with ultrasound carotid duplex (USCD) to find out, assess, and evaluate carotid artery disease in patients with ischemic stroke. Background Stroke is the third most common cause of death worldwide. Strokes can be ischemic or hemorrhagic. Carotid artery stenosis is considered a major cause of ischemic stroke. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was done on 50 patients with ischemic stroke to compare ultrasound duplex of the carotid system and CTA regarding stenosis percentage and degree and the plaque characteristics (site, dimensions, nature, number, and hemodynamic affection), including intima-media thickness. All of the study procedures were carried out and approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, in June 2021. Results Regarding the degree of stenosis, USCD showed more stenosis percentage than CTA (47 vs. 43%, respectively, for first lesion, 60 vs. 40%, respectively, for second lesion, 55 vs. 45%, respectively, for third lesion, and 80 vs. 20%, respectively, for fourth lesion). Regarding the plaque nature, USCD showed almost close results to CTA (47% soft atheromatous plaques vs. 46% in CTA, and 50% calcified plaques in both). Regarding the plaque number, USCD detects more plaques than CTA (20 cases have no plaques in CTA vs. nine in USCD). Conclusion The study recommends the combination of USCD and CTA in patients with ischemic stroke, as CTA is more sensitive regarding the degree of stenosis and USCD provides more descriptive data about the plaque characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in ischemic stroke (n=50). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) vs. Ultrasound carotid duplex (USCD) was evaluated on stenosis percentage and degree and plaque characteristics. Ultrasound carotid duplex detected a higher percentage of stenosis and more plaques than computed tomography angiography in patients with ischemic stroke (9 vs 20 cases with no plaques).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: