This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Higher sFlt-1/PlGF ratios >85 are associated with earlier pre-eclampsia diagnosis. • An sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >85 does not necessitate immediate delivery. • High sFlt-1 is associated with preterm delivery for maternal indications. • Low PlGF is associated with preterm delivery for fetal health concerns. • sFlt-1 and PlGF levels may help distinguish pre-eclampsia clinical subtypes. To evaluate the outcomes of pregnancies with elevated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratios >85 and determine whether the individual components of the ratio are independently associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary obstetric unit in central London, UK on singleton pregnancies with sFlt-1/PlGF ratios >85 recorded between November 2021 and February 2024. Gestational age (GA) at pre-eclampsia diagnosis and delivery, birthweight, and indication for iatrogenic delivery were analysed in relation to the magnitude of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and the individual sFlt-1 and PlGF values. Non-linear regression modelling was applied. Seventy five cases were included. The median interval from the first ratio >85 to delivery was 10 days. PlGF showed a non-linear association with GA at time of preeclampsia diagnosis, best described by a logistic growth curve (R 2 = 0.43). For GA at delivery, the relationship with PlGF followed an exponential growth curve, where lower PlGF was associated with earlier delivery (R 2 = 0.58). High sFlt-1 levels were significantly associated with maternal indications for preterm delivery, whereas low PlGF levels correlated significantly with fetal indications for delivery. An sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >85 alone does not necessitate immediate delivery. Our findings suggest two potential overlapping pre-eclampsia phenotypes: high sFlt-1 aligning with maternal vascular dysfunction, and low PlGF indicating predominantly utero-placental disease. These findings support more tailored antenatal surveillance and management strategies based on the individual biomarker profiles, rather than the ratio alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hubble et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: