Key result
Left atrial appendage closure significantly increased left atrial emptying fraction compared with preoperative function (SMD 0.53; 95% CI 0.04-1.01; p=0.03), but did not influence other parameters.
Why the study?
Left atrial appendage closure is effective in patients with atrial fibrillation not candidates for long-term anticoagulation, but its impact on left atrial function is unknown.
Does left atrial appendage closure improve left atrial function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=260)
Does left atrial appendage closure improve left atrial function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.53 (95% CI 0.04–1.01)
p-value: p=.03
Left atrial appendage closure is associated with an improvement in left atrial emptying fraction, though it does not significantly influence other parameters of left atrial function.
Background Left atrial (LA) appendage closure (LAAC) is effective in patients with atrial fibrillation who are not candidates for long‐term anticoagulation. However, the impact of LAAC on LA function is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of LAAC on atrial function. Methods This meta‐analysis was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. A search strategy was designed to utilize PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google scholar for studies showing the effect of LAAC on the LA function from inception to November 20, 2021. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated from the means and standard deviations. Results Of 247 studies initially identified, 8 studies comprising 260 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a significant increase in LA emptying fraction following LAAC compared with preoperative function (SMD: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04–1.01; p = .03; I 2 = 75%). In contrast, there were no significant differences in LA volume (SMD: −0.07; 95% CI: −0.82–0.69; p = .86; I 2 = 92%) peak atrial longitudinal strain (SMD: 0.50; 95% CI: −0.08–1.08; p = .09; I 2 = 89%), peak atrial contraction strain (SMD: 0.38; 95% CI: −0.22–0.99; p = .21; I 2 = 81%), strain during atrial contraction (SMD: −0.24; 95% CI: −0.61–0.13; p = .20; I 2 = 0%), strain during ventricular systole (SMD: 0.47; 95% CI: −0.32–1.27; p = .24; I 2 = 89%), strain during ventricular diastole (SMD: 0.09; 95% CI: −0.32–0.51; p = .66; I 2 = 65%). Conclusion LAAC is associated with improvement in the left atrial emptying fraction, but did not significantly influence other parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostafa et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation (n=260). Left atrial appendage closure vs. Preoperative function was evaluated on Left atrial emptying fraction (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.04-1.01, p=.03). Left atrial appendage closure significantly increased left atrial emptying fraction compared with preoperative function (SMD 0.53; 95% CI 0.04-1.01; p=0.03), but did not influence other parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: