Key result
One specific (ARN)x element in glmS and residues 66-72 in the C-terminal extension of E. coli Hfq are essential for activation of GlmS expression by GlmY, but not GlmZ.
Specific (ARN)x motifs and the Hfq C-terminal extension are essential for non-canonical sRNA regulation of GlmS in bacteria.
Elucidates sRNA selectivity in bacteria; leaves open generalization to other species or systems.
Hfq is an important RNA-binding protein that helps bacteria adapt to stress. Its primary function is to promote pairing between trans-acting small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) and their target mRNAs. Identification of essential Hfq-binding motifs in up-stream regions of rpoS and fhlA led us to ask the question whether these elements are a common occurrence among other Hfq-dependent mRNAs as well. Here, we confirm the presence of a similar (ARN)(x) motif in glmS RNA, a gene controlled by two sRNAs (GlmZ and GlmY) in an Hfq-dependent manner. GlmZ represents a canonical sRNA:mRNA pairing system, whereas GlmY is non-canonical, interfacing with the RNA processing protein YhbJ. We show that glmS interacts with both Hfq-binding surfaces in the absence of sRNAs. Even though two (ARN)(x) motifs are present, using a glmS:gfp fusion system, we determined that only one specific (ARN)(x) element is essential for regulation. Furthermore, we show that residues 66-72 in the C-terminal extension of Escherichia coli Hfq are essential for activation of GlmS expression by GlmY, but not with GlmZ. This result shows that the C-terminal extension of Hfq may be required for some forms of non-canonical sRNA regulation involving ancillary components such as additional RNAs or proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salim et al. (2012) studied this question. Hfq C-terminal mutations and glmS:gfp fusion was evaluated on GlmS expression and regulation. One specific (ARN)x element in glmS and residues 66-72 in the C-terminal extension of E. coli Hfq are essential for activation of GlmS expression by GlmY, but not GlmZ.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: