Why the study?
Does the PEN regimen (prednisone, oral etoposide, mitoxantrone) improve response rates and survival in elderly patients with advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
Does the PEN regimen (prednisone, oral etoposide, mitoxantrone) improve response rates and survival in elderly patients with advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
The PEN regimen is an active initial treatment for elderly patients with advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, though it carries risks of myelosuppression and cardiovascular events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PEN may be considered for elderly patients with advanced aggressive NHL; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of survival benefit.
This phase II study was designed to improve the outcome of elderly patients with advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL's) by employing a novel chemotherapy regimen PEN (pred-nisone, oral etoposide and mitoxantrone), as initial treatment. Between July 1991 and September 1993, 43 patients (14 male, 29 female) aged 66–82 years (median 74) received 1–8 (median 4) courses of PEN (total 192) q28 days (prednisone 50 mg od x 14 days, oral etoposide 50 mg od x 14 days and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) in the ambulatory setting. Pathologies of patients' tumors classified by the Working Formulation (WF) included C = 4, D = 2, E = 1, F = 7, G = 25, H = 4. Eighteen patients (42%) had stage IV, 15 (35%) stage III, 9 (21%) stage II and 1 (2%) stage I disease. Nineteen patients (44%) had B symptoms, 7 (16%) primarily extranodal disease and 15 (35%) bone marrow involvement. Patients with congestive heart failure, current anti-failure medication or pretreatment Muga left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 45% (median pretreatment 60%) were excluded from PEN.After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 1–30), 14 of 33 evaluable patients (42%) have achieved CR of their disease for 8+ months (range 4–19) and 6 (18%) PR for 6+ months (range 5–10), giving an overall response rate of 61%. Ten (30%) patients did not respond to PEN and 10 were not evaluable for response. Response to PEN was not predicted by any pretreatment characteristic. Twenty six patients enrolled on study are alive. The estimated median survival is 26 months and the predicted survival at 2 years is 58% (Kaplan-Meier). Myelosuppression was the dose limiting toxicity of PEN. World Health Organization (WHO) grade > = 3 neutropenia (< 1.0 × 109/L) occurred in 22 (51 %) patients on at least one occasion and was associated with fever in 12 (28%). However, only 8 (19%) patients had grade > = 3 neutropenia for 2 consecutive weeks of a treatment cycle. Three patients (7%) died from treatment related neutropenic sepsis. Anemia and thrombocytopenia (WHO grade > = 3) occurred in 8 (19%) and 3 (7%) patients respectively. Cardiovascular events on study included 2 deep vein thromboses, 3 pulmonary emboli (1 of whom died) and 2 episodes of congestive heart failure. Three patients (7%) developed an LVEF of < 45% on study. Other non-hematologic toxicities were minimal with only 2 patients experiencing WHO grade > = 3 nausea, 3 stomatitis and 2 fatigue.In summary, PEN is an active, well-tolerated new regimen for use in elderly patients with NHL's. It is particularly easy to administer on a once 4 weekly schedule in the ambulatory setting. Consideration should be given to a definitive phase III study of PEN versus CHOP with or without hematopoietic growth factor support. Further study is merited due to the poor outcome and significant morbidity currently associated with the use of CHOP in elderly patients with NHL's.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goss et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: