Why the study?
Long QT syndrome type 3 involves abnormal cardiac sodium channel function leading to ventricular fibrillation, for which amiodarone is approved, but the impact of pacing frequency on amiodarone's efficacy remained unknown.
Does amiodarone reverse the arrhythmic phenotype induced by augmented late sodium current in a mouse model of LQT-3 at different pacing frequencies?
Does amiodarone reverse the arrhythmic phenotype induced by augmented late sodium current in a mouse model of LQT-3 at different pacing frequencies?
Amiodarone does not reverse the arrhythmic phenotype in a mouse cardiomyocyte model of LQT-3, suggesting its clinical efficacy in this condition may depend on other mechanisms.
Long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT‐3) is a disease related to abnormal cardiac sodium channel function (Nav 1.5), usually due to augmented late sodium current (I NaL ), and may lead to ventricular fibrillation. Amiodarone is approved for ventricular fibrillation. Thus, we investigated whether pacing frequency impacts the ability of amiodarone to reverse the arrhythmic phenotype observed in LQT‐3. Anemone neurotoxin 2 (ATX‐II, here named only ATX) was used to enhance I NaL in mice left ventricular myocytes (LVM). A video detector system monitored sarcomere shortening. At 1 Hz, amiodarone attenuated sarcomere shortening only at 10 µmol/L; at 3 and 5 Hz, 0.1 and 1 µmol/L amiodarone also reduced sarcomere shortening. However, no effect of amiodarone was observed on time to 50% of sarcomere contraction and relaxation. In LVM exposed to ATX (10 nmol/L), an arrhythmic phenotype was observed, and it was more severe when cells were paced at 1 Hz. Amiodarone failed to reverse the ATX induced phenotype at different pacing frequencies. Thus, our results suggest that amiodarone's ability to reverse arrhythmias induced by augmentation of I NaL is limited. These findings suggest further experimentation will be required to clarify whether a clinical effect can be ascribed to an effect of amiodarone on other ion channels in LQT‐3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beserra et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: