Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the potential of global strain analysis using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography to predict heart failure in patients with STEMI following revascularization.
Does two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography predict the development of heart failure in patients with STEMI after revascularization?
Does two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography predict the development of heart failure in patients with STEMI after revascularization?
Global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, and twist measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the acute phase of STEMI are strong predictors of subsequent heart failure development at 6 months.
Global strain may refine post-STEMI HF risk stratification; leaves open incremental value over standard echo parameters.
Aim . To study the potential of global strain analysis using two-dimensional speckletracking echocardiography to predict the heart failure (HF) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the 6-month follow-up after revascularization. Material and methods . The study included 114 STEMI patients aged 52 (44; 59) years. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed with analysis of standard parameters and speckle tracking with analysis of strain and rotational characteristics of the myocardium. Concentration of brain natriuretic peptide was determined. The endpoint was the presence of heart failure (HF) after 6-month follow-up. observation. The analysis of HF risk was carried out using ROC-curves based on 3 criteria. Strain parameters with the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity were chosen as a cutoff point. Results . Six months after STEMI, depending on the ejection fraction (EF) value, the patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 — patients with reduced EF (<40%) (HFrEF); group 2 — with mid-range EF (40-49%) (HfmrEF); group 3 — with preserved EF ≥50% (HFpEF). Strain and rotational characteristics differed between groups (p<0,001 for all). It was found that in the acute period of myocardial infarction, global longitudinal strain (GLS) <9,5% (AUR =0,804, 95% (confidence interval (CI) (0,673; 0,936), p=0,001) and global circumferential strain (GCS) <8,7% (AUR =0,722 (95% CI (0,568; 0,875), p=0,012) predicts the development of HFrEF. These values less than 12,5% (AUR =0,830 (95% CI (0,749; 0,911), p=0,001) and 13% (AUR =0,759 (95% CI (0,664; 0,855), p=0,001) is associated with HFmrEF The Twist had the highest predictive value in relation to HFrEF — 4,2° (AUR =0,998 (95% CI (0,993; 0,100), p=0,001). Conclusion . GLS, GCS and Twist have high sensitivity and specificity and can be used in wide clinical practice as simple and cost-effective indicators of HF risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Олейников et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: