Key result
Worse 3D-STI global longitudinal strain is linked to ~59% higher HFpEF risk in uremic patients.
Why the study?
Conventional echocardiography does not identify abnormal cardiac function for HFpEF in patients with uremia, necessitating evaluation of 3D speckle-tracking imaging for diagnosis.
Does three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (3D-STI) accurately detect HFpEF and predict recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in uremic patients?
Observational (n=108)
Does three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (3D-STI) accurately detect HFpEF and predict recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in uremic patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.586
p-value: p=<0.001
3D-STI parameters, particularly global longitudinal strain, can effectively identify HFpEF and predict recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in patients with uremia.
May aid HFpEF detection in uremia via 3D-STI; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Conventional echocardiography does not identify abnormal cardiac function for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with uremia. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (3D-STI) for HFpEF in uremia patients. METHODS: A total of 108 participants were divided into the non-HFpEF group (n = 54) and the HFpEF group (n = 54) based on whether they met the diagnostic criteria for HFpEF as specified in the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. The study compared various parameters between two groups, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), global area strain (GAS), left ventricular global peak twist angle (twist), and torsion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors influencing HFpEF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) of GLS, GCS, GRS, GAS, twist, and torsion parameters in predicting the occurrence of HFpEF in uremia patients. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic value of GLS for recurrent adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Compared to the non-HFpEF group, the HFpEF group showed lower values for GLS, GCS, GRS, GAS, twist, and torsion (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that GLS was an independent risk factor for HFpEF in patients with uremia (Exp(B) = 1.586, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that GLS had an AUC value of 0.794, with a sensitivity of 90.7% and a specificity of 55.6%. The GAS, with an AUC value of 0.793, had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 53.8%. The GRS, with an AUC value of 0.803, had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 57.4%. Cox regression analysis showed that GLS was a risk factor for recurrent adverse cardiovascular events (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-STI is effective in identifying altered cardiac function indicative of HFpEF in uremic patients, demonstrating potential predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Uremia with or without HFpEF (n=108). Three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (3D-STI) parameters vs. Non-HFpEF uremia patients was evaluated on Presence of HFpEF (OR 1.586, p=<0.001). Global longitudinal strain assessed by 3D-STI was an independent predictor of HFpEF in uremic patients (OR 1.586; P<0.001) with an AUC of 0.794.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: