Why the study?
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury causes cardiomyocyte death, and berberine has shown potential cardioprotective effects, but its intrinsic mechanisms require determination.
Does berberine reduce myocardial infarct size and ventricular arrhythmia in animal models of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Does berberine reduce myocardial infarct size and ventricular arrhythmia in animal models of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Berberine demonstrates promising cardioprotective effects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in preclinical models, significantly reducing infarct size and arrhythmias.
Preclinical meta-analysis supports berberine cardioprotection in I/R models; leaves open clinical translation pending human trials.
Objective: Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is one of the causes of most cardiomyocyte injuries and deaths. Berberine (BBR) has been suggested a potential to exert protective effects against myocardial I/R injury. This systematic review aims to determine the intrinsic mechanisms of BBR's protective effects in myocardial I/R injury. Methods: Seven databases were searched for studies performed from inception to July 2020. Methodological quality was assessed by SYRCLE's-RoB tool. Results: Ten studies including a total of 270 animals were included in this study. The methodology quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 to 7 points. The meta-analysis we conducted demonstrated that BBR significantly reduced myocardial infarct size and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia, compared to control groups ( P < 0.00001). Cardiac function of animals in the BBR treatment group was also markedly increased ( P < 0.00001). The index of myocardial apoptosis and the levels of biomarkers of myocardial infarction (LDH and CK) were also decreased in the BBR treatment groups compared to the control groups ( P < 0.00001). Conclusions: The pre-clinical evidence, according to our study, showed that BBR is a promising therapeutic agent for myocardial I/R injury. However, this conclusion should be further investigated in clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: