Key result
Hypertension and higher left ventricular mass index were inversely associated with assignment to the higher AF likelihood group by AI-ECG in patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with AI-ECG assignment to lower versus higher AF likelihood categories in patients with paroxysmal AF remain unclear.
What clinical and echocardiographic factors are associated with AI-ECG-estimated atrial fibrillation likelihood during sinus rhythm in patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=104)
No
What clinical and echocardiographic factors are associated with AI-ECG-estimated atrial fibrillation likelihood during sinus rhythm in patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
In patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, AI-ECG assigned a lower AF likelihood in about one-third of cases during sinus rhythm, with hypertension and higher left ventricular mass index inversely associated with a higher likelihood assignment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May affect AI-ECG AF detection in hypertensive paroxysmal AF; leaves open generalizability and requires prospective validation.
Background Artificial intelligence‐enabled electrocardiography (AI‐ECG) has emerged as a promising tool for identifying patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using sinus‐rhythm ECGs. However, some patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) may be assigned by AI‐ECG to lower AF likelihood categories. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with AF likelihood assignment by AI‐ECG remain unclear. Methods This single‐center prospective study enrolled adults with documented PAF admitted for catheter ablation who were in sinus rhythm on the admission ECG. The four AF likelihood categories output by AI‐ECG were dichotomized into higher and lower groups for analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with assignment by AI‐ECG to the higher AF likelihood group. Results Among 104 patients, 36 were categorized into the lower and 68 into the higher AF likelihood group. Hypertension was associated with lower odds of higher‐group assignment (odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10–0.66). In the echocardiographic model, higher left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was associated with lower (OR, 0.72 per 10 g/m 2 increase; 95% CI, 0.57–0.90) and mild or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) with higher (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.14–7.87) odds of higher‐group assignment. Conclusions A lower AF likelihood assignment by AI‐ECG was not uncommon among patients with documented PAF. Hypertension and higher LVMI were inversely associated with assignment to the higher AF likelihood group, whereas mild or greater TR showed a possible positive association. These findings suggest that AI‐ECG‐based AF likelihood assignment varies among patients with documented PAF during sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (n=104). Hypertension vs. Absence of hypertension was evaluated on Assignment to the higher AF likelihood group by AI-ECG (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.66, p=0.005). Hypertension and higher left ventricular mass index were inversely associated with assignment to the higher AF likelihood group by AI-ECG in patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: