Why the study?
This analysis aimed to qualitatively describe the impact of hyperkalaemia and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.
Does hyperkalaemia and reduced RAASi use impact the rate of 3-year MACE and death in patients with heart failure?
Does hyperkalaemia and reduced RAASi use impact the rate of 3-year MACE and death in patients with heart failure?
In a real-world heart failure population, hyperkalaemia is common and associated with declining RAASi use and increased future MACE and mortality, regardless of baseline LVEF.
Hyperkalaemia and RAASi patterns may affect HF outcomes; observational data leave causal effects and management open for prospective trials.
AIMS: This analysis qualitatively describes the impact of hyperkalaemia (HK) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old; had a serum potassium result between 1 January 2003 and 3 December 2018; had ≥2 separate, non-urgent care or emergency department encounters; and had an HF diagnosis. Criteria were met by 52 253 patients; 48 333 had sufficient follow-up for analysis. Patients were stratified by the presence/absence of HK (serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L) (n = 31 619 and n = 20 634, respectively) and by baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% or >40%. Compared with patients without HK (no-HK), those with HK had significantly higher rates of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, prior diagnoses, and greater RAASi use in both baseline and follow-up periods. Assessed outcomes included RAASi use, rate of 3 year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and individual component rates. Between baseline and follow-up analyses, the proportion of patients on RAASi decreased by 5% in patients with HK but increased by 20% in no-HK patients. Overall, MACE and death were consistently highest in the presence of HK without RAASi treatment (63% and 62%, respectively) and lowest in no-HK but on RAASi (25% and 21%, respectively). After complete multivariable adjustment, these trends were consistent regardless of baseline LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-world HF population, HK was common and linked to baseline clinical risk factors, declining use of RAASi treatment, and an increase in future MACE, regardless of baseline LVEF. Both HK and reduced RAASi use were independent predictors of future MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhlestein et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: