Why the study?
Malignant pleural effusion is intractable, and current mainstream therapies such as indwelling pleural catheter and pleurodesis have drawbacks.
Does medical thoracoscopic thermal ablation improve ORR and TTP in patients with metastatic pleural tumors with malignant pleural effusion?
Does medical thoracoscopic thermal ablation improve ORR and TTP in patients with metastatic pleural tumors with malignant pleural effusion?
Medical thoracoscopic thermal ablation using argon plasma coagulation improves objective response rate and time to progression in patients with metastatic pleural tumors and malignant pleural effusion.
May support thermal ablation for longer TTP in pleural metastases; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Purpose: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an intractable condition. The current mainstream therapies for MPE, ie, indwelling pleural catheter and pleurodesis, have some drawbacks. In this retrospective study, we explored the efficacy and safety of medical thoracoscopic thermal ablation (argon plasma coagulation, APC) therapy for metastatic pleural tumors with MPE. Patients and Methods: A total of 176 patients were enrolled and divided into catheter pleural drainage (CPD) group (n = 77), non-ablation group (n = 46), and thermal ablation group (n = 53). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for between-group comparisons to minimize bias. The primary endpoints were pleural effusion objective response rate (ORR) and time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), chest-tube duration, and safety. Results: Thermal ablation group and non-ablation group showed significantly higher ORR and shorter chest-tube duration versus the CPD group (ORR: thermal ablation, 88.2% vs 66.7%, P = 0.004; non-ablation, 88.4% vs 64.4%, P = 0.042; chest-tube duration: thermal ablation, 4.90 vs 7.24 days, P < 0.001; non-ablation, 5.73 vs 7.33 days, P = 0.010). Thermal ablation group exhibited longer TTP than the CPD group (median, 13.7 vs 7.3 months, P = 0.001) and the non-ablation group (median, 13.6 vs 10.3 months, P = 0.037). OS in the thermal ablation group was numerically longer than that in the CPD group with marginally significant difference ( P = 0.055). There was no significant difference in the frequency of adverse events or changes in vital signs between thermal ablation and non-ablation groups. Conclusion: Medical thoracoscopic thermal ablation (APC technique) therapy was effective and safe in the treatment of metastatic pleural tumors with MPE for improving ORR and TTP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mai et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: