A total of 351 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma were prospectively classified according to the new (1987) TNM classification. Sixty-two patients received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy without surgery. Esophagectomy was performed on 291 patients, among whom 139 underwent cervical, mediastinal and abdominal lymph adenectomy (3-field dissection). The number of stage IIB patients was unnaturally small, and the 3-year survival rates of stages IIA and IIB were similar. The survival curves for patients of T, N and M categories distributed well except for those of stages IIA and IIB. Numbers of patients in N and pN categories and those in M and pM categories showed poor coincidence. The 5-year survival rate for MI patients (10.5%) was too good, which suggested the mingling of patients with rather better prognosis. When MI (LYM) patients were excluded from MI, the 3-year survival rate fell to 0.3%. The 5-year survival rate for pMI (LYM) patients who underwent 3-field dissection was 38.2%. Survival rates and numbers of positive nodes showed negative correlation in patients who underwent 3-field dissection. According to these results, we propose the following revision in the next TNM classification: (1) to group stage IIA and stage IIB together to form Stage II; (2) to include cervical and coeliac lymph nodes among the regional lymph nodes, or to designate metastasis in non-regional lymph nodes separately from metastasis in viscera; and (3) to divide N1 into N1 and N2 according to the number of positive lymph nodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: