Why the study?
Does the plasma level of SDF-1α correlate with the progressive state of arrhythmia and disease burden in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the plasma level of SDF-1α correlate with the progressive state of arrhythmia and disease burden in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Higher SDF-1α levels are associated with permanent AF and longer hospitalizations, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for disease burden and risk stratification in AF patients.
Higher SDF-1α levels associate with AF progression and longer hospitalization; leaves open incremental prognostic value beyond clinical scores.
OBJECTIVES: Stromal cell-derived factor 1a (SDF-1α), is a chemokine and is able to home hematopoietic progenitor cells to injured areas of heart tissue for structural repair. Previous studies have found increased levels of SDF-1α in several cardiac diseases, but only few studies have investigated SDF-1α in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to test SDF-1α in a large cohort of patients with AF and its role as a prognostic marker. DESIGN: Between January 1st 2008 to December 1st 2012, 290 patients with ECG documented AF were enrolled from the in- and outpatient clinics at the Department of Cardiology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark. Plasma levels of SDF-1α were measured using ELISA technique. Clinical data were registered and patient follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: Patients with permanent AF had significantly higher SDF-1α levels (2199.5 pg/ml) than the patients with paroxysmal AF (1982.0 pg/ml) and persistent AF (1906.0 pg/ml), p < 0.0005. Higher SDF-1α level was associated with longer time spent in the hospital per readmission, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In AF patients, a higher SDF-1α level was found in patients with a more progressive state of arrhythmia and was associated with longer hospitalizations. These findings suggest that SDF-1α could prove valuable in risk stratification and evaluating the disease burden in AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: