Why the study?
Preoperative coagulation screening in patients without bleeding disorders is controversial, and the combinatorial risk of abnormal INR, aPTT, and platelet count on transfusion risk was unknown.
Does an abnormal preoperative coagulation profile increase the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion in patients without bleeding disorders undergoing major elective surgery?
Does an abnormal preoperative coagulation profile increase the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion in patients without bleeding disorders undergoing major elective surgery?
Preoperative abnormalities in INR or platelet count are significantly associated with an increased risk of perioperative transfusion in patients without known bleeding disorders.
Equivocal or abnormal preoperative INR was associated with higher transfusion risk; hypothesis-generating for correction trials in elective surgery.
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative coagulation screening for patients without bleeding disorders remains controversial. The combinatorial risk of INR, aPTT, and platelet count (PLT) abnormalities leading to bleeding requiring transfusion is not known in these patients. We examined the association between abnormal coagulation profile and the risk of transfusion following common elective surgery in patients without bleeding disorders. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2004 to 2018 to identify patients without a history of bleeding disorders undergoing common 23 major elective procedures across 10 specialties. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between coagulation profile and bleeding requiring packed red blood cell transfusion intra-/post-operatively. RESULTS: Of the 672,075 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 53.7% presented with normal coagulation profile preoperatively. Overall, 12.2% (n = 82,368) received transfusion. In the setting of normal aPTT/PLT, both Equivocal INR of 1.1-1.5 (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.38-1.44) and Abnormal INR of >1.5 (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.71-1.93) were significantly associated with an increased risk of transfusion. Equivocal (60-70) and Abnormal (>70) aPTT with normal INR/PLT did not demonstrate a comparable risk of transfusion. We observed a synergistic effect of combinatorial lab abnormalities on the risk of transfusion when both Abnormal INR/aPTT and Low PLT of <100,000 were present (aOR 5.18, 95% CI 3.04-8.84), compared to the effect of Abnormal INR/aPTT and normal/elevated PLT (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.48-2.45). DISCUSSION: The preoperative presence of abnormal findings in INR or PLT was significantly associated with the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion during intraoperative and postoperative periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: