Key result
Rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (2.29% vs 2.91% per year; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.91; p=0.03) without significantly increasing bleeding.
Why the study?
Does rivaroxaban reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=353)
Double-blind
Does rivaroxaban reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.76 (95% CI 0.64–0.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.29% vs 2.91%
p-value: p=0.03
In Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin without increasing the risk of bleeding.
Supports rivaroxaban preference in Chinese AF patients; extends prior global RCT evidence to this population.
This study assessed the effects and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. In this double-blind clinical trial, a total of 353 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who were at risk of stroke or systemic embolism were enrolled to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. The primary effect endpoint occurred in five patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.29% per year) and in seven patients in the warfarin group (2.91% per year) (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; p = 0.03). Major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 38 patients (14.3% per year) in the rivaroxaban group and in 36 patients (13.7% per year) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.14; p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between these two arms (p > 0.05). In conclusion, oral administration of rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism without significantly increasing the safety concern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=353). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91, p=0.03). Rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (2.29% vs 2.91% per year; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.91; p=0.03) without significantly increasing bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: