Key result
Hypertension, including masked hypertension, was highly prevalent in children with nephrotic syndrome and was associated with a significantly higher interventricular septum z-score (2.5 vs 1.7, p=0.025) compared to normotensive children.
Why the study?
Hypertension, particularly masked hypertension, adversely affects cardiac function in nephrotic syndrome but cannot be identified during routine clinic visits. This study evaluated the blood pressure status of children with nephrotic syndrome using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring identify masked hypertension and associated cardiac changes in children with nephrotic syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=90)
No
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring identify masked hypertension and associated cardiac changes in children with nephrotic syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.5% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=0.025
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reveals a high prevalence of masked hypertension and nocturnal non-dipping in children with nephrotic syndrome, which are associated with adverse cardiac remodeling.
May support ambulatory BP monitoring in nephrotic syndrome; hypothesis-generating for cardiac remodeling associations.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN), especially masked hypertension, is one of the cardiovascular consequences of nephrotic syndrome. Masked hypertension cannot be identified during routine follow-up visits and adversely effects the patients' cardiac function. The purpose of this study was to use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to evaluate the blood pressure status of children with nephrotic syndrome. METHODS: Ninety children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) participated in this cross-sectional study, which was carried out at Cairo University Children Hospital's nephrology clinic (CUCH). A sphygmomanometer was used in the clinic to measure blood pressure, and a Meditech monitor was used for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Interventricular septum (IVS) was measured, and heart functions were evaluated, using echocardiography. RESULTS: Two groups comprised the included patients: Group1 (n = 70): HTN group included masked and ambulatory hypertension, and Group 2 (n = 20): non-HTN group included normal blood pressure, white coat HTN and well controlled HTN, 35% of the studied cohort (n = 32/90) had masked HTN.The serum urea was significantly higher in HTN group than non-HTN group with p-value: 0.047, while the serum albumin was significantly lower in HTN group than non-HTN group with p-value: 0.017. The cut-off point of 9.9, the sensitivity and specificity of serum urea to predict the occurrence of hypertension in NS patients was 92.9% and 35% respectively, with p-value : 0.024 and 95% CI (0.534-0.798). The z score of IVS is significantly higher in group 1 (2.5 ± 1.2) when compared to group 2 (1.7 ± 2.1) with p-value: 0.025 and Among group 1, it was noticed that 74% (n = 52/70) of them were systolic non-dipper, also it was observed that the mean serum potassium and cholesterol were significantly higher among systolic non-dipper when compared with systolic dipper patients with p-values: 0.045 and 0.005 respectively. CONCLUSION: Children with nephrotic syndrome are particularly vulnerable to experience ambulatory hypertension and masked hypertension, which may adversely impact their cardiac condition because they are not detectable by standard blood pressure readings at the clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alazem et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Nephrotic syndrome (n=90). Hypertension (including masked hypertension) vs. Normotension was evaluated on Interventricular septum (IVS) z-score (p=0.025). Hypertension, including masked hypertension, was highly prevalent in children with nephrotic syndrome and was associated with a significantly higher interventricular septum z-score (2.5 vs 1.7, p=0.025) compared to normotensive children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: