Why the study?
Does continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) improve the detection of hypertension compared to casual blood pressure measurement in children with renal scarring?
Does continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) improve the detection of hypertension compared to casual blood pressure measurement in children with renal scarring?
ABPM is more sensitive than casual blood pressure measurement for detecting hypertension and nocturnal non-dipping in children with renal scarring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABPM may detect more hypertension than casual BP in children with renal scarring; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Renal scarring is the most common cause of arterial hypertension in children. High blood pressure (BP) and microalbuminuria contribute to the progression of chronic renal disease. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were: to assess BP in children with renal scarring by continuous ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in comparison to the casual method (CBP), and to determine the correlation between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and/or casual blood pressure (CBP) values and proteinuria in children with renal scarring, METHOD: This forward-looking study comprised thirty-five children (26 girls and 9 boys), aged between 3-18 years, 10.4 +/- 3.9, X +/- SD. Blood pressure was measured using the casual method (CBP) with a mercury manometer; BP was measured three times and the average was taken as a referent value. ABPM was performed using the oscillometric method with the SpaceLabs device, model 90207. RESULTS: 45.71% of patients were classified as hypertensive by ABPM, while only 22.6% of CBP measurements were above the 95th percentile (p < 0.01). "White coat hypertension" was present in 40% of the patients. Non-dipping BP alteration was detected in 37.14% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal systolic hypertension (systolic non-dipping alteration) is very frequent in children with renal scarring. Nocturnal diastolic blood pressure, detectable only via ABPM, is positively correlated with proteinuria and may be an initial sign of the progression of renal scarring. ABPM is more sensitive than CBP in the evaluation of BP in children with renal scarring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milosevski et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: