Key result
Rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding devices significantly reduced the odds of a very deep implantation depth compared to fast pacing (OR 0.49).
Why the study?
Optimizing valve implantation depth minimizes conduction disturbances and achieves functional integrity, but the impact of intraprocedural fast versus rapid ventricular pacing on depth was uninvestigated.
Does rapid ventricular pacing improve implantation depth in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding devices compared to fast pacing?
Cohort (n=473)
No
Does rapid ventricular pacing improve implantation depth in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding devices compared to fast pacing?
Odds Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.3–0.79)
Absolute Event Rate: -4.9% vs -5.5%
p-value: p=0.004
Rapid ventricular pacing during TAVR with self-expanding devices is associated with a higher (less deep) implantation depth compared to fast pacing, which may help optimize functional integrity and minimize conduction disturbances.
Rapid pacing was associated with higher implantation depth in self-expanding TAVR; hypothesis-generating for deployment optimization, warranting prospective confirmation.
Objectives Optimizing valve implantation depth (ID) plays a crucial role in minimizing conduction disturbances and achieving optimal functional integrity. Until now, the impact of intraprocedural fast (FP) or rapid ventricular pacing (RP) on the implantation depth has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to (1) evaluate the impact of different pacing maneuvers on ID, and (2) identify the independent predictors of deep ID. Methods 473 TAVR patients with newer-generation self-expanding devices were retrospectively enrolled and one-to-one propensity-score-matching was performed, resulting in a matching of 189 FP and RP patients in each cohort. The final ID was analyzed, and the underlying functional, anatomical, and procedural conditions were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results The highest ID was reached under RP in severe aortic valve calcification and valve size 26 mm. Multivariate analysis identified left ventricular outflow (LVOT) calcification [OR 0.50 (0.31–0.81) p = 0.005*], a “flare” aortic root [OR 0.42 (0.25–0.71), p = 0.001*], and RP (OR 0.49 [0.30–0.79], p = 0.004*) as independent highly preventable predictors of a deep ID. In a model of protective factors, ID was significantly reduced with the number of protective criteria (0–2 criteria: − 5.7 mm ± 2.6 vs. 3–4 criteria − 4.3 mm ± 2.0; p < 0.0001*). Conclusion Data from this retrospective analysis indicate that RP is an independent predictor to reach a higher implantation depth using self-expanding devices. Randomized studies should prove for validation compared to fast and non-pacing maneuvers during valve delivery and their impact on implantation depth. Trail registration Clinical Trial registration: NCT01805739. Graphic abstract Study design: Evaluation of the impact of different pacing maneuvers (fast ventricular pacing—FP vs. rapid ventricular pacing—RP) on implantation depth (ID). After one-to-one-propensity-score-matching, independent protective and risk factors for a very deep ID beneath 6 mm toward the LVOT (< − 6 mm) were identified. Stent frame pictures as a courtesy by Medtronic ® . AVC aortic valve calcification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veulemans et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=473). Rapid ventricular pacing vs. Fast ventricular pacing (100-160 bpm) was evaluated on Very deep implantation depth (< -6 mm) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.79, p=0.004). Rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding devices significantly reduced the odds of a very deep implantation depth compared to fast pacing (OR 0.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: