Key result
High TAVI implantation depth linked to a ~3 mmHg lower peak gradient at one year.
Why the study?
Does high implantation depth (≤4 mm) improve long-term hemodynamic valve functionality in patients undergoing TAVI with self-expandable bioprostheses?
Cohort (n=198)
Does high implantation depth (≤4 mm) improve long-term hemodynamic valve functionality in patients undergoing TAVI with self-expandable bioprostheses?
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 17%
p-value: p=.02
High implantation depth (≤4 mm) of self-expandable bioprostheses during TAVI is associated with better long-term hemodynamic valve functionality at 1 year, without affecting all-cause mortality.
Shallower implantation may optimize gradients in self-expandable TAVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
AIM: High position of the self-expandable bioprosthesis CoreValve/Evolut R has been proved to affect immediate hemodynamics of the valve. Whether this may have any impact on long-term procedural outcome has not been defined yet. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the final position of aortic bioprosthesis affects its long-term functionality. METHOD: Consecutive patients (pts) who underwent successful TAVI procedure were evaluated and separated into 2 groups according to the implantation depth (ID): Group I: pts with 4 mm <ID ≤13 mm; Group II: pts with ID ≤4 mm. ID was measured utilizing the final aortography after device delivery and was defined as the distance both from the native non- and left coronary cusp to the deepest edge of the deployed bioprosthesis in the left ventricle. Clinical outcome and echocardiographic parameters were recorded before the procedure, at discharge, at 1-month and 1-year-follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight pts (80 ± 5.5 years, 107 males [54%]) treated with the CoreValve/Evolut R bioprostheses were recorded. Group I appeared to have higher peak gradient (17 ± 6.5 vs 14 ± 5.5 mm Hg, P = .02) as well as Vmax (2 ± 0.4 vs 1.84 ± 0.38 m/s, P = .02) at follow-up after 1 year when compared with Group II (ID <4 mm). Grouping for ID did not affect all-cause 1-year mortality. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation, as well as LVEF at discharge, proved to be independent predictors of all-cause 1-year mortality when adjusted for cofactors. CONCLUSION: Implantation depth under 4 mm seems to have a favorable effect on long-term hemodynamic valve functionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vavuranakis et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=198). Implantation depth ≤4 mm vs. Implantation depth >4 to 13 mm was evaluated on Peak gradient at 1-year follow-up (p=.02). High implantation depth (≤4 mm) during TAVI was associated with a lower peak gradient at 1 year compared to deeper implantation (14 vs 17 mm Hg, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: